Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - mudbrook

Pages: 1 ... 18 19 [20] 21 22 ... 24
286
OSPREY RESCUED FROM TANGLE OF TWINE AND ELECTRIC LINE


HARRISBURG – An osprey that had become tangled in bailer twine and caught in electric lines crossing over Cummings Creek Road in Nelson Township, Tioga County, was rescued from its high-wire snare, according to Pennsylvania Game Commission Wildlife Conservation Officer Robert Minnich.


“Employees from Penelec electric company did a great job getting the bird down for me,” WCO Minnich. “Once on the ground, I removed the twine and observed the bird for several minutes checking the leg and foot. No major injuries were found, only a few abrasions and the leg was weak.


“After working the leg slowly, the osprey eventually strengthened and was opening and closing its talons.  When it flew away, I noticed that the leg was hanging a little lower than the other leg, but fine otherwise.”


WCO Minnich returned to the scene on April 12, and found both birds were around the nest site.


“One was sitting in the nest and the other one was sitting on another electric pole eating a fish,” Minnich said. “I believe it was a nice black crappie.


“This is just another example of how litter can have a negative impact on wildlife.  Thankfully, this took place in an area where it could be found and rescued.”


On April 13, WCO Minnich received word about another osprey incident in Middlebury Township, Tioga County.


“I received a call from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers about an osprey on another electric line,” WCO Minnich said. “The Wellsboro Electric Company had removed some nesting material that had been placed on top of the pole that began to burn.


“Wellsboro Electric Company is planning to put up two poles, one of which will have an osprey nesting platform and the other a perch pole.  They then are going to put deterrents on the electric pole and readjust the pole.”


Ospreys are classified as a threatened species in Pennsylvania.  For more information, visit the Game Commission’s website (www.pgc.state.pa.us), put your cursor on “Wildlife” in the menu bar at the top of the homepage, move your cursor to “Research,” click on “Endangered/Threatened Species” and then choose “Osprey” in the “Threatened Species” listing.

287
PA GAME COMMISSION SEEKING INFORMATION ON ILLEGAL PORCUPINE KILLS

Pennsylvania Game Commission Wildlife Conservation Officer Kristoffer Krebs is looking for information about the individual or individuals responsible for the illegal killing and dumping of nine porcupines in Lycoming Township, Lycoming County.


On April 5, the Game Commission Northcentral Region Office was contacted by a Lycoming Township employee regarding numerous porcupines that were placed at the recycling bin at the township building on Dauber Road.


“Carcasses of nine porcupines were placed in front of the recycling bin sometime over the Easter weekend,” WCO Krebs said. “All of the animals had been shot, and one was still alive at the time of the call.  That animal had to be euthanized.


“Eight of the carcasses were whole and one was skinned.  It is possible that the skinned carcass was utilized for consumption.  We would like to request that anyone with information please contact the Northcentral Region Office at 570-398-4744.”


Krebs noted that there are no hunting or trapping seasons for porcupines.

288
PHILADELPHIANS CITED FOR ILLEGAL KILL IN SULLIVAN COUNTY

Two Philadelphia men were charged with the unlawful taking of a deer and lending/borrowing of licenses this past deer season in Sullivan County, according to Pennsylvania Game Commission Wildlife Conservation Officer (WCO) Rick Finnegan.


According to WCO Finnegan, Patrick Campion, 40, shot a doe and asked his friend, Mike Schauffele, to tag it because he didn’t have an antlerless deer license tag.  After pleading guilty, Campion was ordered to pay more than $1,200 in fines and court costs and will likely lose his hunting privileges for two years.


By agreeing to use his tag for a deer he didn’t lawfully harvest, Schauffele became involved and was fined $200.


“This deer was believed to have been shot from a cabin the two were renting in Eagles Mere with other family members,” WCO Finnegan said. “There was bait all around this area, and clear drag marks from the gut pile to their cabin, but none of the cabin members would admit to what had happened.


“Evidence was collected and with the help of Philadelphia County WCO Jerrold Czech, who collected written statements made during interviews with both violators.”


Several concerned citizens from Eagles Mere put Finnegan on the trail of this case, which would have gone unknown without their stepping forward and calling.


“The disturbing thing about this is that Campion shot a doe knowing that he didn’t have a doe tag, and then got his friend Schauffele involved by using his tag, and then took the deer home to give it away to someone else,” Finnegan said. “Why would someone go through all of this trouble to kill a deer that he didn’t even want?”

289
SULLIVAN COUNTIANS CITED FOR ILLEGAL KILL OF TUNDRA SWAN/DEER

HARRISBURG – Pennsylvania Game Commission Wildlife Conservation Officer (WCO) Rick Finnegan recently completed two cases involving the illegal killing of a tundra swan and a white-tailed deer in Sullivan County.


Jesse Richart, 21, of Forksville, Sullivan County, was cited for illegally killing a tundra swan in March of 2009 in northern Sullivan County.


“A concerned citizen called me with information that he had been watching a pair of tundra swans at a local pond, but one was now dead,” WCO Finnegan said. “I responded, expecting to do a necropsy to determine the cause of death, but it was immediately apparent that the bird was shot with a rifle.


“A few months later, when interviewing Richart about a deer that he had illegally killed – which cost him and another defendant $900 each, plus the loss of their hunting privileges for three years each – I learned he also may have been the one who shot the tundra swan.”


After collecting evidence and seizing the rifles from Richart that were suspected to have been used in these poaching cases for ballistics testing, WCO Finnegan received a full written confession from Richart on how he and another – whom he would not identify – had been out spotlighting.


“The confession detailed that when they saw the swan, Richart shot it from the vehicle,” Finnegan said. Several citations were filed in which Richart pled guilty to all charges, which will cost him $600 and he likely lose his hunting privileges for four years, in addition to the three years for the deer last year.


In another case, 25-year-old Thomas J. White Jr., also from Forksville area of Sullivan County, pled guilty to the unlawful possession of a white-tailed deer.  White was observed with a dead deer in the back of his truck, which he proceeded to dump in a nearby field.  Field Forensics testing proved that it had been shot twice in the head with a .17-caliber firearm.


“During an interview I conducted, along with Deputy WCO Jeff Spako, White gave several false statements, including what happened to his .17-caliber firearm, and how he obtained the deer,” Finnegan said. “White said he hit the deer with his truck, which certainly was not the case, given the condition of the deer carcass. There was nothing except for the two bullet holes in the head.


“Also, White never called the Game Commission to obtain a free permit number to lawfully possess a road-killed deer.”


White pled guilty and was ordered to pay $500 plus costs and will likely lose his hunting privileges for three years.


“It’s safe to say that there are poachers in every part of our state, and until Pennsylvania’s fines and penalties for poaching are increased, law-abiding hunters – as well as all Pennsylvanians – will continue to have to suffer the loss of game and wildlife,” said WCO Finnegan. “It’s a shame when wildlife is taken for granted and poachers get away with it.  When people in the community speak up, a WCO can be more effective investigating crimes against wildlife and enforcing the law.


“Give the large district that each WCO covers, he or she can’t be everywhere. That’s why public participation is so important. The sooner we get the information, the better our chances of solving the investigation. Without that initial phone call, a lot of poaching cases would go unfounded, and these are just a few real life examples of that.”


Finnegan also noted that current fines and penalties do not always appear to be a deterrent, as evidenced from some repeat violators.


“The Game Commission is supporting legislation that would increases fines and penalties for those chronic poachers,” WCO Finnegan said.


House Bill 1859, sponsored by House Game and Fisheries Committee Chairman Edward G. Staback (D-Lackawanna), would increase fines and penalties for poaching. The bill was approved by the House on July 21, by a vote of 196-3.  The bill was approved by the Senate Game and Fisheries Committee on Jan. 26, and presently awaits further consideration in the Senate Appropriations Committee.

290
Turkey Hunting / PA WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT UNIT SPRING GOBBLER REPORTS
« on: April 13, 2010, 11:48:54 AM »
PA WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT UNIT SPRING GOBBLER REPORTS

Mary Jo Casalena, Pennsylvania Game Commission wild turkey biologist, prepared a report for each Wildlife Management Unit (WMU), to share more detailed information on spring gobbler hunting prospects.

 

WMU 1A – Spring harvests remain well above the statewide average, but will continue to be well below average for this WMU. Summer reproduction has been below average since 2005.  The Game Commission shortened the fall season to two weeks in 2005 in an attempt to help increase the population in this WMU. Expect the 2010 spring harvest to remain higher than the state average, but lower than last year for this WMU due to the below-average reproduction during the past several years which provided a smaller proportion than normal of older gobblers. The key here is to scout prior to the season.

 

WMA 1B – Expect harvest to be excellent compared to the statewide average and above average for the WMU. Even though last summer’s reproduction was below average, reproduction in 2008 was excellent providing a high proportion of two-year old males in the population, which typically comprise the largest percent of each spring’s harvest. This age class of adult gobblers are very vocal and readily come to hunter’s calls.

 

WMU 2A – Still well above the statewide average, but well below average for itself.  Fall turkey season was shortened from three weeks to two weeks in 2007, which will allow more turkeys to survive to the 2010 spring season.  With the below average proportion of two- year-old males in the population there will be less gobbling heard than normal for this WMU. However, there still may be a good proportion of the older, less vocal three- and four-year old gobblers, so scouting for these birds will be important this year.

 

WMU 2B – Variable. This WMU is difficult to predict because of the lack of public land.  For hunters who secure access to hunting areas, prospects are above the state average for calling in a gobbler, but below average for this WMU due to poor reproduction during the past two summers.

 

WMU 2C – Spring harvests here have been improving since the low in 2006 and should continue to increase this spring due to a combination of a shorter fall season length from three to two weeks since 2004, and excellent reproduction in 2007 and 2008 providing a higher than average proportion of two- and three-year-old gobblers in the population. These vocal longbeards are what the majority of Pennsylvania turkey hunters seek. Spring harvest densities (harvests per square mile) remain below the statewide average.

 

WMU 2D – Above average harvest expected compared to the state, but below average for this WMU. Although summer reproduction last year was average, providing a good proportion of juvenile males (jakes) in the population, reproduction in 2008 was poor, providing a below average proportion of the more sought after and highly vocal two-year old gobblers. The fall turkey season here was decreased in 2009 from three weeks to two weeks to help the population increase to its previous high levels.

 

WMU 2E – Excellent for this WMU for harvesting juveniles (jakes) and three-year-old gobblers, but below average for harvesting the most vocal two-year old gobblers. With the two-week fall turkey season since 2004, spring harvests have been improving, and expect the same this spring.

 

WMU 2F – The population has increased from that of the last several years due to above-average reproduction in 2008 and the shortened fall season (from three weeks to two weeks from 2007-2009). Expect the spring harvest to increase from last year due to the high proportion of two-year-old males in the population for enjoyable calling. Harvest density (harvest per square mile) continues to be below the long-term average for this WMU and below the statewide average. However, hunters continue to enjoy hunting the extensive public lands in this WMU.

 

WMU 2G – Excellent for this WMU for harvesting juveniles (jakes) and three-year-old gobblers, but below average for harvesting the most vocal two-year old gobblers. The population is rebounding to the long-term average for this WMU, but spring harvest densities (harvest per square mile) are still below the state average. Hunters continue to enjoy hunting the extensive public lands in this WMU.

 

WMU 3A – Below average reproduction during the last two springs will result in a below-average spring harvest for this WMU, but the harvest will remain above the state average. There still remains higher than average proportions of three-year and older gobblers, but these present the most challenging age classes to harvest.

 

WMU 3B – This should be a banner harvest year for this WMU and well above the statewide average. Summer turkey sightings here have been above average during the last two summers translating to a high proportion of juveniles (jakes) and the vocal two-year old adult gobblers, which typically is the most sought after age class.

 

WMU 3C – Below average reproduction during the last two springs will result in a lower spring harvest than last year, but expect the harvest to remain above average for this WMU and well above the state average. There remains higher than average proportions of three-year and older gobblers, but these present the most challenging age classes to harvest.

 

WMU 3D – Expect a similar harvest to last year, which was average for this WMU, but above the statewide average.  Although there are fewer juveniles (jakes) in the population due to below average summer reproduction last year, the average proportion of two-year old gobblers will provide an enjoyable spring season.

 

WMU 4A – Expect the harvest to be average for this WMU and similar to the state average. Population of three-year-old gobblers is above average due to the record reproduction in 2007, but this age class typically presents a challenge for spring turkey hunters. The two-week fall season since 2004 may be helping this population to rebound. 

 

WMU 4B – Above the statewide average, but average for this WMU. With the two-week fall season since 2004, spring harvest densities have been increasing even though this WMU has had tremendous fluctuations in summer reproduction recently.

 

WMU 4C – Second best 2009 spring harvest density (harvest per square mile) in the state and hunters should expect a similar harvest this year. This WMU continues to maintain one of the highest spring harvest densities in the state, even though the summer turkey sighting index trend remains below the statewide average. With the above-average populations of juvenile (one-year old) and two-year old males from above average reproduction during the past two summers in this WMU, hunting prospects again will be excellent.

 

WMU 4D – Above average for this WMU, below the statewide average. Although last year’s reproduction was only average in this WMU the population of two-year old gobblers is above average, which should provide for an abundance of gobbling. Spring harvest density (harvest per square mile) has been improving for the past four years, and expect this to continue.

 

WMU 4E – Like WMU 4C, this is another turkey hotspot. Highest spring 2009 harvest density (harvest per square mile) in the state. Also, summer turkey sightings show a record number of jakes (juvenile males) and two- year-old gobblers in the population. Expect this year’s harvest to be even better than last year’s.

 

WMU 5A – Above average for this WMU; far below the statewide average. Although harvests and summer turkey sightings continue to be some of the lowest in the state, the closed fall turkey season has been aiding in population increase. Even though summer reproduction last year was below average, the above-average reproduction in 2008 means an abundance of the vocal two-year old gobblers this spring for this WMU.

 

WMU 5B - The data set for this WMU is minimal, but overall, expect an above average harvest compared to itself. Hunters could be very successful if they seek out the younger, juvenile (jake) males due to the above average summer reproduction last year in parts of this WMU.  There are below average proportions of two-year and three-year-old gobblers. Harvests and summer turkey sightings are some of the lowest in the state.

 

WMU 5C – Below average for this WMU and below average compared to the state. Summer reproduction was below average for the last two years in much of this WMU, providing below average proportions of juvenile (jake) and two-year gobblers, which typically comprise the majority of the harvest.

 

WMU 5D – Data set is too small to predict harvest.

291
Turkey Hunting / PA HUNTERS REMINDED ABOUT SECOND SPRING GOBBLER TAG
« on: April 13, 2010, 11:47:54 AM »
PA HUNTERS REMINDED ABOUT SECOND SPRING GOBBLER TAG

Pennsylvania hunters who would like the opportunity to harvest a second spring gobbler can purchase a second spring gobbler tag until the spring gobbler season begins on May 1, according to Game Commission Executive Director Carl G. Roe.  In fact, thanks to the new Pennsylvania Automated License System (PALS), hunters can purchase a second spring gobbler tag at any issuing agent or through the agency’s website.


In the past, hunters had from Jan. 1 until April 1 to submit an application for the second spring gobbler tag and wait for the agency to mail the license back to them.  The process was made necessary to spread out administrative workload of processing and handling licenses for the fall hunting seasons.  However, thanks to PALS, hunters can now purchase the second spring gobbler tag at any issuing agent and walk out of the store with the license in hand.


Roe noted that hunters are able to take one spring gobbler as part of their general hunting privileges.  However, the second spring gobbler tag license affords those hunters interested in this additional opportunity to take a second spring gobbler.  Hunters may only purchase one second spring gobbler license during a license year, as the season limit remains two spring gobblers, but they may only harvest one bird per day.


“So, if you are looking for that application in your digest to mail in, you won’t find it,” Roe said. “You can just purchase the special spring gobbler license either through the Game Commission’s website or visit your local license issuing agent.”


Fees set by state law for the special license are $21.70 for residents and $41.70 for nonresidents. 

292
PA 2010 SPRING GOBBLER SEASON SNEAKING UP ON THE CALENDAR

HARRISBURG – This year marks the 42nd anniversary of the Keystone State’s spring gobbler hunting season, and the Pennsylvania Game Commission is reporting turkey hunters should expect to find exciting opportunities afield as they head out for both the youth and traditional spring season openers.


The state’s one-day youth spring gobbler season is April 24; the general spring gobbler season is May 1-31. Hunters who have purchased a second spring gobbler season license may harvest up to two bearded turkeys. (See second article about availability of second spring gobbler license.)


“Wild turkeys continue to be the second most popular game species in Pennsylvania,” said Carl G. Roe, Game Commission executive director.  “Spring turkey hunting has become so popular that there now are more spring turkey hunters (239,000) than fall turkey hunters (183,000), according to our annual Game-Take Survey.  Also, ever since 2001, spring gobbler harvests have exceeded fall turkey harvests.”


The first spring gobbler season started on a Monday and ran only six days so biologists could get a pulse on hunter success and the season’s impact on the more than 60,000 wild turkeys inhabiting about half of Pennsylvania’s forestland at the time. It worked! More hunters were afield on the last day of the season – a Saturday – than the opener, and hunters took a total of 1,636 turkeys in the new season.


The preliminary harvest estimate for the 2009 spring gobbler season shows that hunters took 43,677 bearded birds (which included a harvest of 41,397 using the spring gobbler tag attached to all general hunting licenses, and 2,280 using the special spring gobbler license) from an estimated statewide spring population of about 345,000.  (Final figures will be available in July after the results of the Game-Take Survey are compiled.) The spring wild turkey population peaked in 2001, when it numbered 410,000. So, it’s fair to say the status of wild turkeys has changed dramatically over the past 40 years.


“Pennsylvania began to establish its well-respected presence in the annals of America’s wild turkey management history back in the ‘60s through the efforts of two biologists who made their peers stop and look at what was going on here,” said Mary Jo Casalena, Game Commission wild turkey biologist. “Gerald Wunz and Arnie Hayden refined turkey trap-and-transfer techniques and multi-season frameworks to help turkeys reclaim their former range throughout the state.


“With each passing year, the turkey population grew, and ultimately compelled the agency, in 1980, to close its turkey farm, which had produced more than 200,000 birds over its half-century of operation.”


Today, Pennsylvania manages one of the most prolific wild turkey populations in America. It is an accomplishment that is directly related to both previous and ongoing management practices, the state’s outstanding tapestry of turkey-friendly habitats and the resiliency of Pennsylvania’s wild turkeys.


“The preliminary 2009 spring gobbler harvest was the fourth highest on record,” Casalena said. “It is nine percent above the previous three-year average, and three percent above the previous 10-year average, which included a period when Pennsylvania logged five consecutive harvests of more than 40,000 gobblers.”


Final spring gobbler harvests, prior to 2009’s preliminary harvest of 41,397, are: 40,522 in 2008; 37,880 in 2007; 39,297 in 2006; 32,593 in 2005; 41,017 in 2004; and 42,876 in 2003. The preliminary fall wild turkey harvest was about 23,068, which is down from the 26,500 in 2008, but is up substantially from the 21,900 in 2007, and 21,500 in 2006. Final 2009 harvest figures will be available later this summer.


In 2009, 2,280 second spring gobblers were taken by the 10,720 hunters who purchased the special spring gobbler license.  That compares with 1,954 second turkeys taken by 8,795 license holders in 2008; 1,507 turkeys by 7,585 license holders in 2007, and 1,454 turkeys by 8,041 license holders in 2006.


So what can hunters expect this spring? According to Casalena, another great spring season is in store for hunters.


“The reason for the optimist outlook is due to the excellent summer reproduction two and three years ago, which has provided for a higher proportion of adult (two- and three-year-old) gobblers in the population,” Casalena said. “Reproduction last spring was below average due to the cold, wet spring, so that may impact next year’s spring harvest.


“From our four-year gobbler study that just ended, we learned that hunters select the older ‘long-beards’ over juveniles, or ‘jakes.’  These adult birds gobble the most and come in readily to hunters’ calls, so they are more prone to being harvested.  The older four- and five-year-old age classes usually are much more wary, and there just aren’t many in the population.  So, because of the above-average number of two- and three-year-olds in this year’s flocks, I predict an excellent spring turkey season for Pennsylvania’s gobbler hunters.”


Casalena encourages spring gobbler hunters to spend time scouting, which always plays an important role in hunter success.


“Scouting this spring can improve hunters’ chances by lining up multiple locations for the spring season,” Casalena said. “Prior to the season, however, hunters should consider not using turkey calls to locate gobblers, because it can educate birds and cause them to be less inclined to respond to the early-morning calls of in-season hunters.


“If you’re trying to locate a gobbler, it’s best to head out at first light to listen for calls. Now is a great time! On a still morning, a gobbler’s call often can be detected up to a half-mile away or more.”


Hunters are reminded that it is illegal to stalk turkeys or turkey sounds in the spring gobbler season. Given the wild turkey’s keen senses, it’s not a wise move anyway, but more importantly, it makes a tremendous difference for the personal safety of everyone afield. Over the years, too many hunters have been shot for game while approaching a hunter calling for turkeys, and callers have been shot in mistake for game by stalking hunters.


“Safety must be the foremost consideration of every turkey hunter,” emphasized Keith Snyder, Game Commission Hunter-Trapper Education division chief. “If every hunter followed the state’s hunting regulations and positively identified his or her target as legal game before squeezing the trigger, we could nearly eliminate hunting-related shooting incidents during the spring gobbler season. Unfortunately, it doesn’t always work that way.


“The Game Commission encourages all spring gobbler hunters to hunt safely and defensively. Consider wearing fluorescent orange clothing at all times – even though it is no longer required by law – and treat every sound and movement in the forest as if it is another hunter until you can positively confirm it is a legal turkey. Be patient. Wait until the bird is fully visible before you squeeze the trigger.”


Legal sporting arms are: shotguns plugged to three-shell capacity in the chamber and magazine combined; muzzleloading shotguns; and crossbows and bows with broadhead bolts or arrows of cutting-edge design.


Shot size can be no larger than No. 4 lead, bismuth-tin and tungsten-iron, or No. 2 steel. Rifle-shotgun combinations also may be used, but no single-projectile ammunition may be used or carried.


Carrying or using rifles, handguns, dogs, electronic callers, drives and live decoys is unlawful. The use of blinds is legal so long as it is an “artificial or manufactured turkey blind consisting of all manmade materials of sufficient density to block the detection of movement within the blind from an observer located outside the blind.”


While not required by law, hunters are encouraged to wear fluorescent orange material when moving through the woods. Agency officials also recommend that hunters wrap an orange alert band around a nearby tree when stationary, especially when calling and/or using decoys.


Coyotes may be harvested by turkey hunters. However, turkey hunters who have filled their spring turkey tag or tags may not hunt coyotes prior to noon Monday through Saturday during the spring gobbler season, unless they have a furtaker license. Woodchuck hunting is not allowed during spring gobbler season shooting hours.


Successful spring gobbler hunters must properly tag their turkey and report the harvest to the Game Commission within 10 days, using the postage-paid report card provided with their Digest, or through the Pennsylvania Automated License System. Information to be reported includes the hunter’s name and address; date and location of kill (WMU, county, township) and sporting arm used.


Hunters also are encouraged to report all leg-banded turkeys they take to assist the Game Commission in ongoing research by calling the toll-free number listed on the leg band. Hunters may keep the band; the agency just needs the information on the band.


Junior hunters who participate in the youth spring gobbler day (April 24) are required to have a junior hunting license. On this one-day hunt, junior license holders under 16 years of age must be accompanied by an adult, who cannot carry a sporting arm. Accompanying adults may only provide guidance, such as calling or scouting. All other hunting regulations are the same as those for the general spring gobbler season, including the hunting hours of one-half hour before sunrise until noon and only bearded turkeys may be taken.


And, for the fourth year, youths under the age of 12 years may participate in the spring gobbler seasons through the Game Commission's Mentored Youth Hunting Program. They can hunt with a mentor during either the one-day youth or general spring gobbler season.  Mentored youths need to obtain a permit ($2.70), and must be accompanied by an adult mentor who is a properly licensed and at least 21 years of age. A field harvest tag is provided with the mentored youth hunting program permit.  Mentored youths also are required to report their harvest to the Game Commission either online or by using one of the report card inserts that are part of the digest.   


For additional information about the Game Commission’s Mentored Youth Hunting Program, visit the agency's website at www.pgc.state.pa.us and click on "Mentored Youth FAQs" in the drop-down menu in the “Quick Clicks” box in the right column of the homepage, or consult pages 13 and 33 of the  2009-2010 Pennsylvania Digest of Hunting and Trapping Regulations.

 

293
 LIVE BLUEBIRD NESTBOX CAMERA RETURNS TO GAMECOMMISSION WEBSITE

LIVE BLUEBIRD NESTBOX CAMERA RETURNS TO GAME COMMISSION WEBSITE

 HARRISBURG – In an effort to garner appreciation for wildlife, especially the state’s bluebird population, the Pennsylvania Game Commission launched this year’s webcasting of a live video feed from a bluebird nestbox on the grounds of its Harrisburg Headquarters.  To view the live feed, visit the agency’s website (www.pgc.state.pa.us) and click on the “Bluebird Live-Feed” icon under the opening photo in the center of the homepage.


“The best way to get Pennsylvanians – in fact most Americans – excited about wildlife is to show them what makes wildlife so irreplaceable and priceless,” said Carl G. Roe, Game Commission executive director. “We decided to set-up and use this live webcast to help us educate the public about the importance of wildlife, how to make backyards friendlier to wildlife and also provide a way for folks to simply get closer to bluebirds. Last year, it was a huge hit, and we expect that the broadcasting of this year’s activities again will be well received.


“The nestbox camera provides the public a closer look at the entire nesting process of bluebirds. I’m not sure how many people have ever seen a bluebird form a nest by plowing the materials with its wings. But nest-forming is a fascinating example of nature at work. And it’s something you’ll never see unless you’re checking out our nesting camera.”


Roe noted that a bluebird just took up residence in the box this year and is in the early stages of building a nest.


Launched last year, the bluebird camera was the agency’s first foray into the world of live nest camera feeds. It provides a color video feed plus audio from the bluebird nestbox quarters, which is situated directly behind the agency’s headquarters. A live feed also is broadcast to a monitor in the agency’s lobby.


New this year is the installation of an infrared video camera, which will enable visitors to tune in anytime of day or night.


Steps are taken to deter house sparrows from using the nestbox by mounting monofilament fishing line from the roof over the entrance hole, which compels sparrows to stay away. Bluebird nestboxes placed close to buildings almost always attract competition from sparrows, which annually chase native bluebirds from nestboxes and nesting cavities.


“In the early 1960s, the eastern bluebird was hanging on for dear life,” said Dan Brauning, Game Commission Wildlife Diversity Section supervisor. “The species was suffering from a European invasion of house sparrows and European starlings. Today, it’s not hard to imagine the harm that would come from releasing starlings and house sparrows in New York City during the 1800s. But back then, at a time when people were trying to reverse declining songbird populations, it seemed like the right thing to do in New York.


“The starling spread quickly across America. Released in 1890 and 1891, starlings were building nests in California by the 1940s. What our forefathers didn’t expect, in addition to the rapid range expansion of these alien species, was that they would almost immediately begin competing with bluebirds and other beneficial songbirds for cavity nesting sites.”

 

Bluebirds were enjoying a satisfying existence around 1900. It is when some ornithologists believe Pennsylvania’s bluebird population was at its largest, because fully two-thirds of the Commonwealth was farmland. But the runaway populations of starlings and sparrows would begin to compete with and ultimately cripple the bluebird’s ability to secure adequate nesting.


The species’ problems would be further compounded by farmlands reverting to forestland or being swallowed by development, the increased use of pesticides, and the replacement of wooden fence-posts with metal posts.


By 1960, the bottom was ready to fall out, and the Game Commission and many other conservation agencies and organizations launched an aggressive campaign to rescue the species.

 

With the aid of its Howard Nursery, the Game Commission manufactured inexpensive bluebird nestboxes and bluebird nestbox kits for the public to place afield. Boy Scouts and Cub Scouts became involved, as well as 4-H Clubs, schools and Audubon chapters. Bluebirds became the poster child for efforts aimed at getting people to do something for wildlife in their backyards.


“Today, bluebirds are back in a big way, even in the southeastern counties, where they compete heavily with large populations of house sparrows,” Brauning said. “It’s fair to say that our bluebird population is stronger today than it has been in 50 years. With time and continued assistance from caring Pennsylvanians, it seems likely bluebirds will continue to prosper.”


For more information on bluebirds, visit the Game Commission’s website (www.pgc.state.pa.us), click on “Wildlife” in the menu bar in the banner, click on “Birds,” and then choose “Bluebird Home” from the listing.

294
PA GAME COMMISSION/ALTOONA CURVE ANNOUNCE BASEBALL TICKET DISCOUNT BY SHOWING CURRENT LICENSE
 

HARRISBURG – Coupling two of America’s favorite pastimes – baseball and hunting – Pennsylvania Game Commission and Altoona Curve AA Baseball officials today announced that fans who bring their current Pennsylvania hunting or furtaker license to any Wednesday home game will earn a $1 discount on grandstand tickets. This offer will start with the April 14 game against the Richmond Flying Squirrels at 6:30 p.m., and run through the Aug. 25 game against the Erie SeaWolves at 7 p.m.


“This agreement has provided an added value to the price of a Pennsylvania hunting and furtaker license,” said Carl G. Roe, Pennsylvania Game Commission executive director. “We are pleased that the Altoona Curve recognizes the importance of our license buyers to wildlife management, as well as the economy, of the state and the Altoona region, by offering this discount.”


“We are glad to extend this offer through the Pennsylvania Game Commission,” said Chuck Griswold, Altoona Curve Sponsorship Account Executive. “We know those with hunting licenses will appreciate the value, entertainment, and great baseball they will experience at Blair County Ballpark at a terrific price.”

     

The Altoona Curve is the AA Affiliate of the Pittsburgh Pirates, and has its field at 1000 Park Ave. in Altoona.  For more information on upcoming Wednesday home games, visit the Altoona Curve’s website (www.altoonacurve.com).

295

WEST VIRGINIA WOMAN GUILTY OF POACHING IN WASHINGTON COUNTY


HARRISBURG – Trishelle Barish, 22, of Weirton, West Virginia, recently pled guilty to 10 charges related to a poaching incident in mid-January in Hanover Township, Washington County, according to Pennsylvania Game Commission Wildlife Conservation Officer Daniel T. Sitler.


Barish pled guilty to six counts of unlawful use of lights while hunting; one count of resisting or interfering with an officer; one count of damage to property; and two counts of loaded firearms in a vehicle. She pled guilty to all charges on March 23, and was ordered to pay more than $6,000 in fines and restitution, plus court costs. In addition to $3,100 in fines, Barish was ordered to pay $2,400 in restitution for the three deer she killed, and $506 in costs to repair a light that she shot out. WCO Sitler also issued 10 written warnings for various other charges.


On Jan. 16, WCO Sitler received a call regarding shooting and spotlighting deer the previous night in Hanover Township by someone in a dark-colored Chevy car. The witness observed the spotlight and shots coming from this vehicle near a field by his house.


“During the initial investigation, I discovered a deer that had been shot further up the road at a different location,” WCO Sitler said. “The deer had a small caliber hole near the back of the head. This was confirmed while talking with residents at this next house. I then set up on night patrol that night.


“At around 10:45 p.m., I heard the distinct sounds of a rim fire rifle. I began driving towards that location and then ducked into a driveway when the headlights of a vehicle were seen. The vehicle passed my location, at which time I observed a spotlight come out of the passenger side and two shots were fired at deer. I maneuvered my vehicle behind the car and engaged my emergency lights, and the driver sped away.”


After following the vehicle, WCO Sitler radioed the license plate of the car to the Game Commission’s Southwest Region Office dispatcher.


“I was unable to follow the vehicle when it reached Route 18,” WCO Sitler said. “The vehicle was last seen heading north in Beaver County. I then went back to the scene and recovered two empty .17 caliber casings, and requested assistance from the Weirton Police.

 

“We went to the address listed from the license plate search, and found the car parked in the driveway. The owner of the car would not admit to anything at that time, but she did give me permission to search her car, in which I found an empty box of .17-caliber Federal ammunition that was the same brand found at the scene.  I also found out that her boyfriend’s parents live in Beaver County near where I lost sight of the car on Route 18.”


Over the next week, Beaver County WCO Matthew Kramer assisted WCO Sitler with the investigation, and they were able to find several spent .17-caliber Federal casings and .22-caliber shorts on the same road.  These matched up to witness accounts from Jan. 15.


“I contacted Hanover Police and found a report of shots being fired on another road on Jan. 16 at around 11:30 p.m.,” Sitler said. “I spoke with the witness at this location and found additional spent .17-caliber Federal casings along with .22-caliber short casings at two different locations on this road.  I also dispatched a deer at this location because of an injury.  Upon examination, I located a small caliber hole located in the head of this deer.  I then checked on the complaint of a light being shot out on the same night.  A spent .17-caliber Federal casing was found at this location.”


After securing a search warrant for the boyfriend’s parent’s house in Beaver County, WCOs Sitler and Kramer located and seized one .17-caliber rifle and one .22-caliber rifle belonging to the homeowner’s son.


“I received another call regarding a dead deer found in another field further down the road from the initial shootings,” Sitler said. “We located another .17-caliber casing along the road in line with the dead deer.  In total, we found six locations with .17-caliber and .22-caliber ammunition.  Of these six locations, three deer were found to have been shot.”


WCOs Sitler and Kramer met with Barish at the Hanover Township building, where she confessed to shooting at and killing deer at various locations, along with shooting out the light and fleeing Sitler’s attempt to stop her.


“However, she would not tell us if anyone else was involved in the poaching incidents,” Sitler said. “She also admitted that the shootings were for fun and that there was no interest in recovering the deer.


“This is a prime example of why the Interstate Wildlife Violator Compact is needed. As Barish is a nonresident and will have her hunting privileges revoked in Pennsylvania, she will be able to hunt in her home state.”


Senate Bill 1200, sponsored by Senate Game and Fisheries Committee Chairman Richard Alloway II (R-33), recently passed the Senate by a unanimous vote, and presently is awaiting further action in the House Game and Fisheries Committee.

     

 

TWO CHARGED IN TWO-DAY POACHING SPREE IN WESTMORELAND COUNTY

A two-day poaching spree in early December that resulted in at least eight dead deer has been resolved with guilty pleas by Ryan James Simonds, 20, of Derry, and Garrett A. McConnell, 19, of New Alexandria, according to Pennsylvania Game Commission Wildlife Conservation Officer (WCO) Seth T. Mesoras.


Charges were filed at District Judge Mark Bilik’s office in Bradenville. Each defendant was charged and pled guilty to: two counts unlawful use of lights while hunting ($575 for each count for each defendant); six counts of unlawful taking or possession of game or wildlife ($300 for each count for each defendant); one count of damage to property ($75 for each defendant); and one count of restrictions on recreational spotlighting ($75 for each defendant). Simonds and McConnell were ordered to pay fines and costs totaling nearly $3,400, as well as nearly $9,000 for damages to a house and car. The defendants also will be subject to multiple years of license revocation.


According to WCO Mesoras, on Dec. 6 and 7, between the hours of 10 p.m. and 4 a.m., Simonds and McConnell went on a shooting spree that resulted in seven deer being killed, and injuring one that was required to be put down. During this time, a house and car were struck with errant shots. Four dead deer and the one injured deer were recovered on Latimer Lane; two found dead on Mannitto Road, and one on Stephenson Road. All of the deer were shot the same night with 12-gauge buckshot and slugs. The deer were all left where they were shot with no attempt to take them.


Of the nearly 60 shots reportedly fired that night, 40 empty casings were recovered from three roads along which the deer were found dead.


“At one point during their night-long shooting spree, Simonds and McConnell were shooting at a deer that had crossed the road in front of them and they missed,” WCO Mesoras said. “The projectiles traveled about 150 yards and struck a house and car. Of the nine pellets that are in one “00” buckshot shotshell, seven struck the side of the house and one struck the side of the car in the driveway. Several of the pellets entered the house that was occupied at the time. Fortunately, no one was injured or killed.”


Mesoras noted that the final break in the case came after four days of solid investigation for 18 hours or more a day.


“The only two pieces of information I had were that the incident involved a red Chevy Cavalier, and I had the first three numbers of the license plate,” WCO Mesoras said. “I was speaking with someone at a local store and a woman overheard me talking and went home and told her husband. It just so happened that her husband saw the defendants on a road that we had not previously known about on the same night shooting at deer. He took down the license plate number and gave it to another individual expecting him to call in. The other person never did, but the anonymous witness called us after he had heard from his wife about the shooting spree.

 

“We then immediately went to the new location and found the same shell casings on the road. We ran the license plate number, and went to McConnell’s house, where we found his red Chevy Cavalier.”


A search warrant was obtained for the car and the house and the evidence was retrieved. The defendants later confessed through a course of interviews.


“The disappointing part about this case is that roughly 60 shots were fired that night in the New Alexandria area that we know of, and only two witnesses initially stepped forward,” WCO Mesoras said. “The defendants showed a complete disrespect for the wildlife of Pennsylvania. When an incident like this occurs it should be remembered that they were shot on the Sunday night of rifle season and these were deer that could have been legally harvested by someone else.”


Mesoras praised the hard work of the Westmoreland County Deputy WCOs.


“It was definitely a team effort, as when one of us would feel like we have exhausted all of the options we would talk with another officer and get new ideas or avenues to explore,” Mesoras said. “The final break that led to the arrests in the case was a result of being out in the field asking questions.”


Mesoras also thanked a local butcher, Samuel Monteparte, who helped collect five of the deer and cut them up for the Hunter Sharing the Harvest Program.


“At least all of the meat did not go to waste,” Mesoras said. “It also should be noted that this is just one of the many poaching incidents that occur throughout the year. For every one that the deputies and I caught at least four more got away.”

Release #031-10

April 9, 2010

For Information Contact:

Jerry Feaser

717-705-6541
PGCNews@state.pa.us

296
PA BOARD OF GAME COMMISSIONERS TO MEET ON APRIL 19-20

 HARRISBURG – The Pennsylvania Board of Game Commissioners will be meeting on Monday and Tuesday, April 19-20, at the agency’s Harrisburg headquarters, 2001 Elmerton Ave., just off the Progress Avenue exit of Interstate 81. The meetings will begin at 8:30 a.m. on both days.


On Monday, April 19, the Board will hear public comments on the proposed 2010-11 hunting and furtaking seasons and bag limits that were given preliminary approval in January. The Board also will receive agency staff reports and updates.


On Tuesday, April 20, the Board is scheduled to take official action to finalize the 2010-11 hunting and furtaking seasons and bag limits, and to set antlerless deer license allocations for the upcoming seasons.


A complete agenda for the meeting will be posted on the agency’s website (www.pgc.state.pa.us) prior to the meeting.


Minutes from the January meeting are available in the “Resources” section under “Reports/Minutes.”

297
Great Lakes Fishing / How Deep Are My Downriggers?
« on: March 23, 2010, 12:39:09 PM »
How Deep Are My Downriggers?
By Captain Jim Hirt
I received this e-mail recently and thought it was a good question that more anglers would be interested in. Should you have a question please e-mail me from my Website contact us page http://www.bluemaxcharters.com I will be pleased to answer. My charter season is done and I have time to talk.

Hi Jim,
My name is Brian I may have e-mailed you before, but I forget. Anyway, I just ordered some spoons from you. I personally have never fished spoons, we always fish plugs or cut plug herring for Lakers and Browns. I keep hearing that this is the best go to lure for most Lakers and browns in the great lakes, but not many people out here in Oregon really use them (with exception to apexes, and even that's far and few between).

What do you recommend for set back in the rigger and what is your typical speed? On your Magnum Reaper Spoons, what depth should I assume if I was to set back 300 feet trolling at 2 to 2.3 mph if I have the lure in the clip at say 40 feet? Would my lure be at 45 feet?

We typically go anywhere from 1.8 to 3.2 mph, depending on what's triggering the bite. You may think we're a little nutty for throwing the lure back 100 yards, but our lakes up here are VERY clear (at least the ones that hold the big fish) and as we target trophy browns mostly, and they're so wary, that's why.

Hello Brian:
I thank you for your spoon order. I have over 60 articles that should answer some of your questions. The http://www.badgertackle.com website has all my articles posted. Your question about downrigger setback and speed is rather complex. Your speed will vary for type of fish. Lake Trout like cold water and slow speed of 1.5 to 2.0 is always best. At slower speeds downrigger blowback is not too much of an issue. Blowback is the amount of loss to depth from the weight not hanging straight down when the boat is trolling. This is how I usually adjust for loss in depth. If you use a setback of 50 feet at 100 down the spoon will run at 90 feet or about a 10 percent loss. The variables here are weight of downrigger ball, direction speed of the water current and speed of the boat.

Here is the answer to your specific questions..
What do you recommend for set back in the rigger and what is your typical speed? On your Magnum Reaper Spoons, what depth should I assume if I was to set back 300 feet trolling at 2 to 2.3 mph if I have the lure in the clip at say 40 feet? Would my lure be at 45 feet?

This is how I would do it.
My set back is usually 50 feet
Day in day out my most productive speed is 1.8 measured at the ball. The Reaper Magnum Spoon will produce consistently between 1.0 to 2.8 MPH.

The depth set as you described would be about 35 feet
This time of year I Have lots of availability for questions please call me.

 Good Luck Captain Jim. Let's go fishing!! Jim charters out of Milwaukee, WI. with Blue Max Charters. He can be reached at 414-828-1094 or visit his web site at http://www.bluemaxcharters.com Copyright© 2009, James J. Hirt, All Rights Reserved.

298
Great Lakes Fishing / Planer Boards As Your Primary Trolling Tool
« on: March 23, 2010, 12:31:14 PM »
Planer Boards As Your Primary Trolling Tool
By Captain Jim Hirt

Huge Chinook 28.6 pounds caught by Rita Franks

Huge Chinook 28.6 pounds caught by Rita Franks

Water in our ecosystem has gone from low visibility to extremely clear. With this change of environment the angler must evolve in his presentation to produce consistently. This article will talk you through a very effective way to meet these demands for sunny conditions with spooky fish.

Hello all: I consider it a privilege to be a member of your fishing community and pass on ideas and knowledge to everyone. Most of my articles talk about products which I believe will make you a better angler. Some I sell and some I find of a quality level worth my endorsement. My goal is to always serve the community and enrich your fishing experience.

Now is the time to move to the next generation of presentations. If you find yourself behind the pack when it comes to putting fish in the cooler, a system of planer boards will improve your learning curve.

Allow me to outline and give details of several options in planer board fishing. This will provide some ideas you may want try in the upcoming season. I highly recommend them.

Equipment for getting started
While there is some expenses involved the rewards will be great. Initially two boards will get you going. Expect to pay between $25 and $35 each for individual board with many more or less expensive choices. I will give details on my first choice and then offer some others.

There was a time when long lines with weight were the standard for getting the baits well behind the boat. This is a system of inline weight attached to the line about four feet ahead of the bait. By changing the weight size you will raise or lower the spoon or bait in the water column.

The function of a planer board is to increase your odds by moving the bait off to the side of the boat. By presenting lures outside of the boat's path in undisturbed water you will find them more likely to bite. Each board is made in a way that when trolled behind the boat it will move to left or right of your travel path. Some boards, like the Church Tackle TX 22, are reversible allowing you to run them left or right.

Rigging is simple. After you have let out the line to the distance you would like, attach the board with the clip provided by the manufacturer. Once the board is attached lower the board into the water allowing it to run off to the side of the boat. When the fish strikes you may do one of two things. Do not release the board just reel the board to the rod tip and hand release it. Then finish reeling in your fish. A second option is to release the board, which slides down the line toward the inline weight and stops. The board is reeled in with the fish and the fish is netted.

Up to now we have talked about individual boards that go on each line. You can also go with a large board towed on each side of the boat pulled by a heavy monofilament line. The line is let out the same as before and then attached with a release to the heavy mono line to the large board. As you let out additional line the release will slide down the mono toward the board. You may stop the release any time along the way to the large board. When the fish strikes the line pulls free of the release and the fish is reeled in. Then the line is reset and attached to tow line again. The draw back of this system is it requires a tall mast to pull the large boards and is not transferable boat to boat. The advantage to individual boards is less cost and I find them more efficient in setting line and cranking in fish when on a hot bite.

Good Luck! Jim charters out of Milwaukee, WI. with Blue Max Charters. He can be reached at 414-828-1094 or visit his web site at http://www.bluemaxcharters.com Copyright' 2010, James J. Hirt, All Rights Reserved

299
Great Lakes Fishing / Salmon On Spoons And Why!
« on: March 23, 2010, 12:27:48 PM »
Salmon On Spoons And Why!
By Captain Jim Hirt
With a few pointers and the reason behind them you may find spoons as a great addition to your salmon fishing arsenal.
Over twenty-five years in the pursuit of salmon has brought me to the conclusion that no single approach is the answer to salmon success.

John Begorath and his son with a couple of nice Chinooks

John Begorath and his son with a couple of nice Chinooks


Defining Success.

My days are long and my customers are many. I run upward of one hundred seventy five salmon charters per season with a wide variety of conditions.

I must be on fish each and every day offering opportunities and excitement non-stop. This puts me in a different situation in the terms of what I consider a successful outing on the water.
Whatever you consider a great day, I believe for most anglers that are trolling for salmon spoons are the way to go. Spoons are deadly at the correct speed and will out produce all other lures even when not at their optimum speed. This makes them a perfect choice for the novice and master angler.

Selection by size
Match up the bait! Size is as important to productive fishing as any of the other variables. The rules are simple: match lure size to the forage of your target and if fishing is slow or dead go to smaller size spoons. For example the first light bite was fantastic and you were on your way to a limit catch. Then the sun comes up bright in a clear blue sky and all the action stops. I believe the reason for this is too much flash produced by large lures can turn off fish. This is time to scale down to smaller lures. This approach can be applied any time you find yourself in bright conditions.

Selection by light intensity
The marriage of light and color is essential! Light is the number one consideration in your lure color selection. This is a good time to talk about color as it relates to the amount of light.

You may or may not remember learning the colors of the rainbow in school. The colors are remembered by this acronym "ROY G BIV". These letters mean red, orange, yellow, green, blue, indigo and violet.

There are exceptions to every rule. Most of the time I run lure colors of red, orange, or yellow when that lure is presented in the portion of the water column with the most light. The other end of the rainbow blue, indigo and violet are used in darker or low light situations. You may ask what about silver and white? I consider these as neutral or they will work in any type of light. All the other colors fall into either bright or dark. Bright lures are used in bright light conditions dark lures in low light.

A relatively new and much improved addition to spoon colors is the glow in dark colors. After charging up the glow paint on the spoons with a bright light, they will take fish in the dark or stained water. You will find several manufactures with this product. I have found the glow on Badger Tackle spoons will last longer than most of the spoons being sold.
?
Temperature will define the spoon action
The preferred water temperature of your target easily defines spoon action. In the times of the year when the fish you are after cannot find the temperature of the water they like you must adjust to meet conditions.

For instance, you are looking to hook up with Brown Trout and the water temperature is 40 degrees, twenty degrees below their preferred range of 58 to 66 degrees. A slower lure action is required for this cold water.

This can be achieved by a slower retrieve rate when casting or a slower boat speed for trolling. The problem with a slow speed is many spoons loose their fish attracting action. A spoon that solves this problem is the Nestor Wobbler made by http://www.badgertackle.com The crankbait action of this spoon is deadly in slow presentations. This spoon also has multiple holes in the lip that will allow you to change from a wobbly baitfish action to a vibrating high-speed action. I recommend the Nestor Wobbler for most salmon, trout, bass and pike. It has been a consistent producer for me. Any time your target is in cooler water than they like slow down.

On the other end of the scale use a spoon with a fast erratic action when you find your quarry in their preferred and or above water temperature.

Summary
Consider all three, action, color and size to become more productive. Fish come in a wide variety of sizes and attitudes and one thing is common to all. You must get their attention if you expect to catch them. Adjust to meet conditions and you will become a better angler. Good Luck let's go fishing! Jim charters out of Milwaukee, WI. with Blue Max Charters. He can be reached at 414-828-1094 or visit his web site at http://www.bluemaxcharters.com Copyright ? 2010, James J. Hirt, All Rights Reserved

300
Great Lakes Fishing / Salmon Fishing Puzzle Solved!
« on: March 23, 2010, 12:22:56 PM »
Salmon Fishing Puzzle Solved!

Anita and Craig Hirt with a nice double of Chinook Salmon
Anita and Craig Hirt with a nice double of Chinook Salmon

By Captain Jim Hirt
Salmon in particular and many other species can be especially finicky and difficult to catch. As all types of fish are unique in their habitat there is some common threads in their DNA. The common factors and threads are the parts of the puzzle that, when fitted together, will solve some of your most difficult questions. Now let's explore the common threads.

Forage is huge!

Forage relates to what your quarry likes to eat and in some cases will eat when necessary. Your research in this area must include local anglers along with bait shops and Internet or magazines. The season, water temperature and ecosystem are all important in your decision. Focus on size, color and location for the best results.

Seasonal patterns

All fish have different preferences as they go through their annual life cycles. Pay special attention to this part of the puzzle. Most anglers know when their target spawns but there is much more to this equation. Each locale will be different and if the second week in April is the time for the bass to be on the spawning beds in your area this may not be true if you are fishing three hundred miles north or south of your location. Observation is key. Look to where you usually find fish and without satisfactory results expand your search.

Temperature is everything

When I do my seminars I constantly harp on temperature as a major player in productive consistent angling. Consider your fishing target much like an opponent in a sport. By knowing the temp preference of the target you will be a leg up on the other anglers. This knowledge will eliminate tons of non-productive water. Temperature will tell you about the attitude and most likely location to fish. A temp that is near the optimum or ideal for your species can be approached with your most aggressive baits and presentations. On the other hand warm water fish that are in cold water will require a slower and perhaps smaller lures or baits.

Summary


Consider all three forage, seasonal patterns and temperature when trying to solve the fishing puzzle and you will be on your way to becoming a better angler. The next article will continue with more parts of the puzzle to complete or at least give some shape and direction to the sport of angling. Adjust to meet conditions and you will become a better angler. Do you like to blog? I have just launched my fishing community at http://www.jimhirt.com Come offer your comments, knowledge and please ask questions. Good Luck let's go fishing! Jim charters out of Milwaukee, WI. with Blue Max Charters. He can be reached at 414-828-1094 or visit his web site at http://www.bluemaxcharters.com Copyright ? 2010, James J. Hirt, All Rights Reserved

Pages: 1 ... 18 19 [20] 21 22 ... 24
Google
  Web http://www.pennsylvaniaoutdoor.com